STBIAS= correct for statistical estimation bias = No

STBIAS=Y causes an approximate correction for estimation bias in JMLE estimates to be applied to measures and calibrations. This is only relevant if an exact probabilistic interpretation of logit differences is required for short tests or small samples. Set STBIAS=NO when using IWEIGHT=, PWEIGHT=, anchoring, IAFILE=, PAFILE=, SAFILE= or artificially lengthened tests or augmented samples, e.g., by replicating item or person response strings.

 

Fit statistics are computed without this estimation-bias correction. Estimation-bias correction makes the measures more central, generally giving a slight overfit condition to Outfit and Infit. Correct "unbiased" computation of INFIT and OUTFIT needs not only unbiased measures, but also probabilities adjusted for the possibility of extreme score vectors (which is the cause of the estimation bias).

 

STBIAS=YES instructs Winsteps to compute and apply statistical-bias-correction coefficients to the item difficulties and to the person measures - based on the current data. This becomes complicated for anchor values and scoring tables. With STBIAS=YES, the item anchor values are assumed to be bias-corrected. Consequently bias is applied to make them compatible with JMLE computations for the current data. The resulting person measures are JMLE person estimates, which are biased. So a person bias correction is applied to them.

 

For the special case of two items for each person, or two persons for each item, please use PAIRED=Yes to correct for bias.

 

With STBIAS=No, there is no statistical bias correction, so the internal and reported values are the same. The process is

 

For unanchored item values,

data + internal person estimates => internal item estimates => reported item estimates

For anchored item values,

anchored item values => internal item estimates => reported item estimates

 

For unanchored person values,

data + internal item estimates => internal person estimates => reported person estimates

For anchored person values,

anchored person values => internal person estimates => reported person estimates

 

For a scoring table

reported item estimates => internal item estimates => internal person estimates => reported person estimates

 

With STBIAS= YES, the internal and reported values differ. The process is

 

Compute bias correction coefficients for item estimates and for person estimates based on the current data.

 

For unanchored item values,

current data + internal person estimates => internal item estimates => item bias correction => reported item estimates

For anchored item values,

anchored item values => undo item bias correction => internal item estimates => item bias correction => reported item estimates

 

For unanchored person values,

data + internal item estimates => internal person estimates => person bias correction => reported person estimates

For anchored person values,

anchored person values => undo person bias correction => internal person estimates => person bias correction => reported person estimates

 

For a scoring table, the process is

reported item estimates => undo item bias correction => internal item estimates => internal person estimates => person bias correction => reported person estimates.

 

Note: it is seen that this process can result in estimates that are worse than uncorrected JMLE estimates. Consequently it may be advisable not to use STBIAS=YES unless the bias correction is clearly required.

 

Question: Are JMLE estimates always biased?

 

Answer: Yes, but the bias becomes inconsequential (less than the standard errors) for tests with more than 20 persons and more than 20 items - www.rasch.org/memo45.htm

 

Question: Are person estimates in JMLE biased as well as the item difficulty estimates?

 

Answer: The Rasch model does not know what is a person and what is an item. Smaller person samples for a given test length and shorter tests for a given person sample size generally make the estimation bias worse. Winsteps is constructed so that transposing the rows and columns of the data matrix (with dichotomous items or the Andrich rating scale model) produces statistically the same item and person measures (apart from a change of sign). CMLE and MMLE do not have this property. This transposition property is convenient in those types of analysis where it is not clear what is a "person" and what is an "item" - e.g., a matrix of street intersections and calendar dates with "0" for no traffic accident and "1" for traffic accident. It also enables analysis with a person-based "Partial Credit" model, where each person has a unique rating scale.

 

Question: Are person estimates obtain from known or anchored item difficulties statistically biased?

 

Answer: Under these circumstances, estimation is no longer "Joint" (persons and items), but becomes the AMLE (Anchored Maximum Likelihood Estimation) used to estimate person abilities from item difficulties in other estimation methods (CMLE, MMLE, PMLE, etc.)

 

Question: What is the bias correction used by Winsteps?

 

Assuming dichotomous, complete data:

Unbiased item estimate = biased estimate * (number of items - 1) / number of items

Unbiased person estimate = biased estimate * (number of persons - 1) / number of persons

 

Question: what about other data?

An empirical solution is to estimate the Rasch measures from your data. Note down the person S.D.

Then use the Winsteps "Output Files" "simulate data" option to simulate 10 datasets.

Analyze these, and average the person S.D.s

(This process can be automated using Winsteps "BATCH=" capability)

Compare the average with the original estimate person S.D. - this will tell you the size of the bias.

Then apply USCALE= bias correction to the original analysis to obtain unbiased estimates. The unbiased estimates will always be more central (smaller range) than the biased estimates.

 

Example 1: I have a well-behaved test of only a few items, but I want to correct for statistical estimation bias because I want to me to make exact probabilistic inferences based on differences between logit measures:

 STBIAS=Y

 

Example 2: I have a set of item difficulties from RUMM (or ConQuest or OPLM or ...) and want to construct a score-table that matches the RUMM person measures.

 IAFILE = (RUMM item difficulties)

 STBIAS = No ; don't change the estimates - use the values RUMM uses

 TFILE=*

 20  ; Table 20 is the score table

 *

...

END LABELS

01010101010101010  ; Dummy data records

10101010101010101 ; so that Winsteps will run


Help for Winsteps Rasch Measurement and Rasch Analysis Software: www.winsteps.com. Author: John Michael Linacre

Facets Rasch measurement software. Buy for $149. & site licenses. Freeware student/evaluation Minifac download
Winsteps Rasch measurement software. Buy for $149. & site licenses. Freeware student/evaluation Ministep download

Rasch Books and Publications
Invariant Measurement: Using Rasch Models in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, 2nd Edn, 2024 George Engelhard, Jr. & Jue Wang Applying the Rasch Model (Winsteps, Facets) 4th Ed., Bond, Yan, Heene Advances in Rasch Analyses in the Human Sciences (Winsteps, Facets) 1st Ed., Boone, Staver Advances in Applications of Rasch Measurement in Science Education, X. Liu & W. J. Boone Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences (Winsteps) Boone, Staver, Yale
Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (Facets), Thomas Eckes Statistical Analyses for Language Testers (Facets), Rita Green Invariant Measurement with Raters and Rating Scales: Rasch Models for Rater-Mediated Assessments (Facets), George Engelhard, Jr. & Stefanie Wind Aplicação do Modelo de Rasch (Português), de Bond, Trevor G., Fox, Christine M Appliquer le modèle de Rasch: Défis et pistes de solution (Winsteps) E. Dionne, S. Béland
Exploring Rating Scale Functioning for Survey Research (R, Facets), Stefanie Wind Rasch Measurement: Applications, Khine Winsteps Tutorials - free
Facets Tutorials - free
Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (Facets) - free, J.M. Linacre Fairness, Justice and Language Assessment (Winsteps, Facets), McNamara, Knoch, Fan
Other Rasch-Related Resources: Rasch Measurement YouTube Channel
Rasch Measurement Transactions & Rasch Measurement research papers - free An Introduction to the Rasch Model with Examples in R (eRm, etc.), Debelak, Strobl, Zeigenfuse Rasch Measurement Theory Analysis in R, Wind, Hua Applying the Rasch Model in Social Sciences Using R, Lamprianou El modelo métrico de Rasch: Fundamentación, implementación e interpretación de la medida en ciencias sociales (Spanish Edition), Manuel González-Montesinos M.
Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Fischer & Molenaar Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Georg Rasch Rasch Models for Measurement, David Andrich Constructing Measures, Mark Wilson Best Test Design - free, Wright & Stone
Rating Scale Analysis - free, Wright & Masters
Virtual Standard Setting: Setting Cut Scores, Charalambos Kollias Diseño de Mejores Pruebas - free, Spanish Best Test Design A Course in Rasch Measurement Theory, Andrich, Marais Rasch Models in Health, Christensen, Kreiner, Mesba Multivariate and Mixture Distribution Rasch Models, von Davier, Carstensen
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This does not change what you pay.

facebook Forum: Rasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic

To receive News Emails about Winsteps and Facets by subscribing to the Winsteps.com email list,
enter your email address here:

I want to Subscribe: & click below
I want to Unsubscribe: & click below

Please set your SPAM filter to accept emails from Winsteps.com
The Winsteps.com email list is only used to email information about Winsteps, Facets and associated Rasch Measurement activities. Your email address is not shared with third-parties. Every email sent from the list includes the option to unsubscribe.

Questions, Suggestions? Want to update Winsteps or Facets? Please email Mike Linacre, author of Winsteps mike@winsteps.com


State-of-the-art : single-user and site licenses : free student/evaluation versions : download immediately : instructional PDFs : user forum : assistance by email : bugs fixed fast : free update eligibility : backwards compatible : money back if not satisfied
 
Rasch, Winsteps, Facets online Tutorials


 

 
Coming Rasch-related Events: Winsteps and Facets
Oct 21 - 22 2024, Mon.-Tues. In person workshop: Facets and Winsteps in expert judgement test validity - UNAM (México) y Universidad Católica de Colombia. capardo@ucatolica.edu.co, benildegar@gmail.com
Oct. 4 - Nov. 8, 2024, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com
Jan. 17 - Feb. 21, 2025, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com
May 16 - June 20, 2025, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com
June 20 - July 18, 2025, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com
Oct. 3 - Nov. 7, 2025, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com

 

 

Our current URL is www.winsteps.com

Winsteps® is a registered trademark